Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30

If the SC rules that removing Trump from the ballot is unconstitutional, what would stop Colorado from doing it anyway?


5 posted on 12/20/2023 5:03:45 PM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: GSWarrior

The law means nothing to the lawless.


6 posted on 12/20/2023 5:04:34 PM PST by Jonty30 (In a nuclear holocaust, there is always a point in time where the meat is cooked to perfection. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: GSWarrior

Supreme Court will fold on this if they review it. There’s already 4 votes to do it and Roberts will likely add the 5th vote.


8 posted on 12/20/2023 5:08:31 PM PST by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: GSWarrior

“what would stop Colorado from doing it anyway?”

Nothing. But, what if we figure a way to reject Colorado’s electors? Based on bullshit?


16 posted on 12/20/2023 5:32:10 PM PST by Big Giant Head ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: GSWarrior
"what would stop Colorado from doing it anyway?"

Perhaps the USSC would then declare that Colorado was in violation of Federal law and its election of Federal officers is invalid, and void. Plus, Colorado's electoral votes are also therefore deemed invalid and cannot be cast.

24 posted on 12/20/2023 7:19:14 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: GSWarrior
If the SC rules that removing Trump from the ballot is unconstitutional, what would stop Colorado from doing it anyway?

The 14th amendment section 2 has a punishment for abridging the right to vote:

But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
The Constitutional punishment for preventing voters from voting for Electors of their choice in a state should be the direct loss of seats in the House of Representatives, and the indirect loss of Electors in the next election.

If the Colorado Supreme Court blocks President Trump from appearing on the ballot, they are denying the entire state the right to choose President Trump. It doesn't matter what polling suggests the actual vote would be, the entire state is denied the choice.

The 14th amendment should punish Colorado with the loss of their ENTIRE House delegation, and with it their Electoral College allocation, leaving Colorado with only the two Electors based on the Senate.

-PJ

25 posted on 12/20/2023 7:28:24 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson