I’m not so sure how evil, America hating etc the liberal SCOTUS left is.
I think it comes down to them being not remotely experienced in the law to make lawful decisions.
I find them cowardly, when in fact they should be free to pass judgement based on the constitution not their politics.
It seem like the conservative judges, esp
Roberts, feels compelled to even out the verdicts.
YOu know, let rule for the left this time, and next time for the right etc.
Problem is, the left judges don’t see it that way. They will vote 100% politically on every issue.
The right judges, the good ones, will vote on each case independent of the politics.
At least that is what I hope, but lately, we don’t know how they will rule.
I find Kavanaugh wishy washy, and Roberts also.
You know how Alito and Thomas will respond, maybe Gorsuch too.
Anyway, I don’t see this ending well unless some common sense prevails.
I believe that oversimplifies the issue. The Court's credibility is only as good as their decisions being adhered to. And sometimes, politics played a role in cases being accepted for hearing.
Politics were definitely a consideration shortly thereafter Brown v. Board of Education I was decided in 1954. Supreme Court law clerks in 1954 noted that Justices were wary of taking on cases regarding state anti-miscegenation laws, which were pretty clearly unconstitutional as they used race as a classification to criminalize interracial marriage.
To me proof that the court is a complete liberal/anarchic disaster is that they have absolutely no problem doing something absolutely contrary to the spirit and letter of the Constitution, like socializing medicine.
Once they have done something like that, there is no way to redeem the SCOTUS.
Your endorsement of Roberts as someone who "feels compelled to even out the verdicts" is lost on me. To me, he is clearly compromised, and his decisions, like others on the SCOTUS, are so arbitrary and illogical that it is always a guessing game how he will rule. For that matter, it is a total tossup on how the SCOTUS will rule on almost every decision.
I ask you, should it be a complete tossup on how the SCOTUS should rule for every case? What about Kelo v. City of New London? WTH is going on when the pretense of eminent domain is used to expropriate one citizen's property and give it to another? Such a perversion of eminent domain.
You really don't have to be a lawyer to see that that is a bad, bad, ridiculous decision. Even a seventh grader can see it.
So whenever we get the runup to a SCOTUS, everyone gets nausea, because no one has ANY idea on how these clowns are going to rule. Maybe Thomas and Alito are a little better. But as a whole they are all vain, self-important, America-hating, Constitution-hating, clowns. So arbitrary and crazy when it comes to the law that rock/paper/scissors would be a better way to deal with SCOTUS decisions.