Nice catch steve
Noah’s Nightly News – 12/20/23
https://truthlion.com/noahs-nightly-newsletter-12-20-23/
* Trump vs. Biden — (Baby Please Come Home)
* President Trump Issues Ominous Warning…
* Financial Article
* The REAL Reason The FBI Raided Mar-a-Lago Revealed?
* Former White House Lawyer and Noted Trump Critic, Ty Cobb, Tells CNN Why Supreme Court Will UNANIMOUSLY Overturn Colorado Sup. Ct.
* Another State Expected To Rule On Removing Trump from Ballot This Friday
* Six More States Now Actively Investigating REMOVAL Of President Trump From 2024 Ballot
* Did You Know Abraham Lincoln Was Also Removed From The Ballot In An Election?
* Top Pollster: Trump Is Now “More Likely” To Beat Biden After Colorado Ballot Ruling
* Ron DeSantis Asked If He Will Stand With Vivek and Trump and Remove His Name From the CO Ballot
* The Secret Weapon to Avoid Being a Victim of the Next China Virus?
* UPDATE: Recalled Applesauce Products Intentionally Tainted With Lead?
* Something BIG is about to go down… multiple confirming signals point to cyber takedown of financial system
* PRAYER CHAIN: Can We Get One Million People Praying for Trump?
Steve Van Doorn wrote:
“
said, “I hope the USSC smacks down the Colo supreme court ruling”
US supreme court doesn’t need to do anything. Trump will be on the ballot by their own ruling.
It says right in the ruling. When Trump appeals this to the US supreme court this case will have a stay on it.
They ruling pointless and makes a joke out of our legal system.
“any review by the U.S. Supreme Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court”
https://law.justia.com/cases/colorado/supreme-court/2023/23sa300.html
“
Ok the way I read this is, the Colo Court is saying they’ll hold off implementing the removal of PDJT’s name from the ballot till Jan 4th, and if there’s a challenge raised (by PDJT’s campaign or others) at the USSC between then and now, then the holding off will continue till the USSC decides on it.
I.e they’re saying that the challenge to their ruling and action by the USSC has a time limit, from now to Jan 4th.
The ruling -doesn’t- say anything about what happens after Jan 4th.
So, what good is this ruling anyway?