Posted on 12/11/2023 10:34:53 AM PST by Morgana
One of the biggest problems with the surrogacy programs is that there are few, if any background checks and home checks. Those who would not otherwise qualify for adoption are simply purchasing children, essentially from a catalog, and taking them home. This has opened the door to some of the most godawful people in the world having unfettered access to children.
As I wrote previously, the practice of surrogacy (womb rental) and IVF, especially within the context of homosexual relationships, not only distorts the Biblical design of family but also involves deeply troubling ethical concerns. In IVF, multiple embryos are often created, with the inherent risk that several will not survive. This raises significant moral questions from a Christian perspective, as life is sacred and worthy of protection from conception. The handling of these embryos, where life is both created and ended in a laboratory setting opposes God’s authority over life.
Yet it’s much worse than that, as we’re seeing every day. Recently, Pop Crave posted an image of two homosexuals, Shane Dawson and Ryland Adams, who bought two twin boys through surrogacy.
As if it wouldn’t be bad enough that sodomites are raising these two children, but it’s so much worse than that. These men didn’t purchase these children because they cared about them or their well-being, they bought them for their own personal pleasure.
So who is Shane Dawson? Well, he’s a pervert who should be behind bars. I absolutely hate to post this but this needs to be exposed for the world to see so that people will know what is wrong with the surrogacy program and put an end to it. I do not want to repeat what he said word for word, but in 2015, during a podcast, Shane Dawson went into extremely graphic detail about having sex with his cat.
Anyone who thinks that sodomites should be able to purchase children needs to have their heads checked. You can listen to the audio at this link.
WTELF!!!!
Yes. IVF may be supported by legitiamate fathers and mothers who have some systemic problem(s) preventing natural procreation of a viable embryo, but I say to them, morally, adoption of an existing parentless child is a better solution.
Need a barf bag?
Even as a Conservative it makes you think we need a government takeover of IVF with government regulations controlling it.
This is wrong on so many levels.
The intellectual in me is curious how that even happens. For one, I would assume the cat was declawed...
The exact opposite is now happening. Any organization that limits adoption to heterosexual couples is castigated and in some cases prevented from continuing in existence. Certainly they don’t receive the type of funding that more “progressive” adoption agencies receive from the government.
The slope is no longer just slippery. It is frictionless.
Morals are in free fall.
Keep it comin’, W.
We’ll make a Catholic out of you yet.
Curiosity killed the...ohh, whatever...🤨
I say, let’s lock him in a cage with a bobcat or a mountain lion and see how that plays out
it’s not white slavery if you buy them in the womb... is that it?
Satanic. Those boys are in serious danger and even in the best circumstances will never know the love of a mother. Demons at work here.
And it's not just happening with sexuality, but with all behaviors, and in every corner of society. People really are doing what they want, when they want, and none of them want to be held accountable in any way. It will only get worse.
“We’ll make a Catholic out of you yet.”
You do not have to be Catholic, at all, to be pro-life. Catholics have no hold on the pro-life movement. And most Catholics who I know do not hold to many pro-life pronouncements of their Church. They go to mass regularly but do not abide by what the Church says on many things. But then again, they’ve been taught that what is important is the rituals performed in and by their Church.
Singer might end up finding common cause with Dennis Prager.
‘Men Want Variety’: Why Dennis Prager’s Defense of Pornography Is Profoundly Dangerous
By Tré Goins-Phillips
Editor
April 14, 2023
Dennis Prager, a conservative author and talk radio host, is trending on social media for sharing what many see as an overly simplistic and undeniably problematic view of pornography.
“Men want variety,” Prager said during a recent round-table discussion hosted by The Daily Wire’s Jordan Peterson, a clinical psychologist and author. Pornography, he went on to say, is “not awful,” so long as it’s used as a “substitute for adultery.”
The problems in that statement alone are plentiful — but he continued.
Prager, a practicing Jew, told Peterson and his fellow panelists that looking at a woman lustfully is “not a sin in Judaism” — a diversion from the Christian belief taught by Jesus, who said, “Anyone who even looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:28, NLT).
“There’s only one way to commit adultery in Judaism, and it’s with a different organ,” he explained, going on to say that, when women call into his radio program to ask about their husbands’ pornography use, he asks if their consumption of the explicit content is impacting their sexual relationships.
“If adultery is a substitute for one’s wife, it’s awful,” he said. “If it’s a substitute for adultery, it’s not awful.”
I didn’t say it would happen tomorrow!
There are no background or home checks on single moms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.