Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FLT-bird
The squatter is the one who was paying the taxes

Not true in this case, according to the article - the rightful owner of the property kept up on his taxes. And in any event, I can't see how paying taxes on property I've stolen can be considered a good reason to let me keep my stolen property in any civilized nation.
7 posted on 12/11/2023 7:51:49 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: AnotherUnixGeek
It doesn't say how long he continued to pay taxes.

In American law, paying the taxes is an important point in adverse possession.

13 posted on 12/11/2023 8:05:32 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
The elements of adverse possession are as best I remember

Adverse and hostile - ie you not asking permission

Continuous and exclusive - going on the property occasionally will not satisfy it. The adverse possessor must be on the property continuously. Also the adverse possessor is not sharing it with others or claiming to be part of a group which owns it.

Open and Notorious - it can't be secret or hidden. You have to be doing it openly such that others can see you're using the property. Several states require that you have paid the property taxes to satisfy this.

For the statutory period....10 years in common law more or less depending on the state.

There was a famous case of this when somehow the plot map of properties a developer put out was one lot off from the plot map that was filed with the state. The upshot was everybody for several whole neighborhoods did not really own the house they were in. They actually owned their neighbor's house next door.

Not a problem you say? It was potentially a big problem. Not every house was exactly the same. If you were on a smaller lot or had a less expensive house than your neighbor, you had a financial incentive to make a claim to your neighbor's house and land.

The Court ruled that every homeowner owned his home by adverse possession and that this therefore quieted title....ie nobody can press any claims that might otherwise have been technically legal but.....c'mon....that would have been scummy and would have caused chaos. Courts do not like instability and chaos and for public policy reasons, will take steps to prevent it whenever they can.

38 posted on 12/11/2023 10:16:20 AM PST by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson