To: 4Runner
An anchor baby of two non-citizen parents is not a natural born citizen.
3 posted on
12/03/2023 11:41:39 AM PST by
Reno89519
(It's war. No one murders and takes Americans hostage. Time to act. Declare war on Islamic Hamas.)
To: Reno89519
An anchor baby of two non-citizen parents is not a natural born citizen.
Certainly not when the parents are in the U.S. illegally. It took an act of Congress to make Native Americans born within the borders of the U.S. American citizens. The children of illegal aliens do not become citizens by the 14th Amendment, which was intended to give citizenship to the children of former slaves.
4 posted on
12/03/2023 11:48:01 AM PST by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: Reno89519
correct. Because they are not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”
To: Reno89519
To: Reno89519
50 posted on
12/03/2023 2:33:30 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Reno89519
14th Amendment, in part: “ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
The intent of this Amendment, as I was taught many years ago, was to guarantee citizenship or the freed slaves. In the years since it has been bastardized to include anchor babies.
57 posted on
12/03/2023 2:49:49 PM PST by
elpadre
To: Reno89519
14th Amendment, in part: “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
The intent of this Amendment, as I was taught many years ago, was to guarantee citizenship or the freed slaves. In the years since it has been bastardized to include anchor babies.
58 posted on
12/03/2023 2:50:31 PM PST by
elpadre
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson