Not quite he makes clear he agrees with the title
He has a problem with some language, some paragraph, about antisemitism
So he voted No on Free speech grounds.
It’s quaint while we continue to endure the worst censorship in the nation’s history.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4199825/posts
It’s noisy for him but he gets to inconsequentially support free speech while folks are going to jail over memes.
Massie is slimy like David Duke.
Just saying.
On free speech grounds.
No.
“ because it equates anti-Zionism with antisemitism.”
He claims to be against anti-semitism, but not anti-Zionism, which is that Israel does not have a right to exist.
He goes in with a non-sequitur wherein he wrongly defines criticism of Israel as anti-Zionism.
“Antisemitism is deplorable, but expanding it to include criticism of Israel is not helpful.”
Criticism of Israel is not anti-Zionism.
He is a serious double-talker and weasel.
He wouldn’t vote for it because it recognizes Israel’s right to exist. He obviously disagrees with that.
No, this has nothing to do with free speech, and equating anti-Zionism and antisemitism does not attack free speech.