In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 11/20/2023 Vol.480, Q Day 2214, ponygirl wrote: That Breitbart article is from 2016. And nothing ever came of it.
ThankQ for having one of 'those' memories that can retrieve useful content on a dime!
I think back to when there was a Q drop, since replaced, that said they (Q) had been informed that if something happened to a key person (I always thought they meant Hillary), the FBI would 'cease to exist as an organization' or some such wording. While that sounds like win-win, I'm guessing it may have been a 'catastrophic threat' (nuke in DC or something BIG). I've thought about that old drop often enough that I'm going to try to go back to old threads to find that post.
That was dropped months after Q1, about Hillary Clinton about to be arrested. Then quite some time after that (at least 2 years? ) I recall an interview with Trump wherein he asked, "What happened to Hillary's arrest? I understood she was supposed to be arrested." The MSM was silent - completely silent instead of savaging him for saying that (well - all I can say is I personally didn't find reporting on it, I could be wrong.
I have since realized time-delay in Q land. For example, I was amazed by Operation Magic Sword- simply cannot imagine dropping American warriors down into Iran to enter a facility and fight, fight fight! Well, a few months later, there was a medal of honor ceremony that may be a result of that action - what little details there were matched plausibly. Secrecy would be lost if the drop about the operation was too closely followed by the medal of honor ceremony (my 2 pesos).
So stringing a few crumbs together, I wondered if Q1 was true when dropped and then the FBI delivered a catastrophic ultimatum, and so she was not arrested. Hillary's arrest drop has always been used to 'debunk' all Q; I think that's why Trump raised the issue in an interview (letting us know it was real).
There have been reports that Hillary is a 'Queen' among the Satanists (for North America at least) and they will protect her to the death..
So the Breitbart article from 2016 may be true, and has yet to be resolved, but in my opinion she's the one protected most. Traditionally, trolling on FR usually goes crazy in defense of her. If the Breitbart information is true, then nothing short of 'FBI catastrophic threat' would be spared to defend Hillary from that exposure. Back when I looked at what information there was, including FOIL etc., I saw far too many outs for the FBI. The debunking of the story requires one to trust the FBI in a number of 'single points of failure'. Even the FOIL is in control of officials I don't trust. Why would that hive of Deep State suddenly become honest? We have an MSM which touts Jan 6 as a bloodbath endangering the republic - so I believe they can, with the help of the Intel agencies, easily hide/repurpose NYPD suicides (This just in - Jeffery Epstein did not kill himself and 'nothing every came of it').
Logically, the Breitbart story would seem to confirm the Satanic beastly nature of HIllary, and did so before Q started posting. I don't have a reason to doubt it, frankly. Those horrific CCTV images from Epstein Island seem like more of the same. So I think it's plausible, and likely, but naturally must wait to see if it turns out to be true once we resume a rule by law.
PS: Because of that prior 'catastrophic threat', I believe threats like it have been in play throughout the 'show', and without them, things would be moving far more swiftly.
++++++++++
The breitbart article is a transcription of a breitbart radio interview with Erik Prince.
you keep pushing that fantasy pant load conspiracy about this...again.
There is so much documentation that blows this story about weiner’s laptop and the NYPD to smithereens
And there is no documentation about 9 of 12 (later became 10) NYPD suicides in 2019 being connected to seeing stuff on the Weiner laptop...
You are like a blind man describing an elephant...
just stop it