” If the “newfangled gadgets” which are not so newfangled were what the buyers wanted, then market forces would have had Toyota meet the demand for same.”
Well that was my point. Many people are luddites (sadly, especially conservatives) and they are part of the “market”, so they naturally shy away from newfangled devices even if they are objectively better.
But you didn’t answer my question...
“Why wouldn’t YOU buy a car that gets way better gas mileage, 600 mile range, more power than one that’s maybe 7% cheaper. Is it strictly the price difference for you? Though you may be making up that difference in a couple of years driving, and would also have a higher resale value?”
Market forces eschewing hybrids is not Luddism. Proof by assertion, and further countenance of usurper Biden’s draconian policies.
I also noticed you using “conservatives” in the third person, as if you yourself are not one.
And I did answer your question, to the effect that I did indeed own and drive cars possessing the qualities you tout. Not even sacrificing range and power.
Have a nice day.