Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Candace Owens Fired from the Daily Wire? What She's Saying Has Put Her Entire Career in Jeopardy
youtube ^ | Nov 15 2023 | Mark Dice

Posted on 11/15/2023 5:55:35 AM PST by euram

Candace Owens endorses Niki Haley for president of.....

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: benshapiro; candaceowens; israel; nikihaley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: djpg

Hopefully. She’s usually pretty with it. I always thought she was pro Trump.


81 posted on 11/15/2023 9:25:51 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra; devere
Candace Owens thinks that Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin faked their moon landing,

Strike one.

Nikki Haley - Strike two

Got me. She endorsed Nikki for president of Israel.

82 posted on 11/15/2023 9:29:49 AM PST by TangoLimaSierra (⭐⭐To the Left, The Truth is Right Wing Violence⭐⭐)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: LS

‼️


83 posted on 11/15/2023 9:36:31 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (🦅MAGADONIAN⚔️)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Uh…no they have not.


84 posted on 11/15/2023 10:16:50 AM PST by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota; T.B. Yoits
Jus soli is not enough.

According to what legal declaration that contravenes the 14th Amendment?

And please, don't post some article from a blogster.

I want to see the official legal declaration that puts an end to "Jus soli" and prohibits a "Natural Born Citizen" of parents who are not citizens of this country, from running for president.

85 posted on 11/15/2023 1:22:58 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

That she is, globalist girl needs to drop out before her poll numbers are embarrassing.


86 posted on 11/15/2023 1:25:15 PM PST by Veto! (FJB Sucks Rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

https://patriot-fire.net/what-is-definition-of-natural-born-citizen/


87 posted on 11/15/2023 1:27:37 PM PST by South Dakota (Patriotism is the new terrorism .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Got to her...

...or bought her.


88 posted on 11/15/2023 1:28:09 PM PST by mewzilla (Never give up; surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Yup. Even after skipping through the stupid video, still my opinion as well.


89 posted on 11/15/2023 1:46:38 PM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco; South Dakota
I could dig it up but the specific references for example of children of diplomats and their staff spell out how children born to parents who are citizens of foreign countries are not natural born citizens and are not eligible to be President.

...exactly as children of a foreign invader who gave birth in the United States would not be eligible for President.

It would be a strange situation where a parent is drafted back home to fight against the United States while at the same time their offspring claims the right to serve as U.S. President.


Nimrata Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Kamala Harris were all born to citizens of foreign countries. The U.S. had no claim for them to stay here if their parents wanted to leave.

90 posted on 11/15/2023 3:15:26 PM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota
I specifically asked you not to post some crap from a blog..Just because it's some blogger, it doesn't make it true.

I want to see the official legal declaration that puts an end to "Jus soli" and prohibits a "Natural Born Citizen" of parents who are not citizens of this country, from running for president.

Either put up or shut up, this "Natural Born Citizen" had been debated endlessly on this forum and you birthers have come up empty every time.....

Not wasting any more time on this crap........

91 posted on 11/15/2023 3:31:03 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits
I could dig it up

Then dig it up and prove your point or shut up.

This crap has been brought up endlessly on this site and none of you idiots have been able to prove your argument other than to cite dumbass bloggers.

I'm done here, good night.........

92 posted on 11/15/2023 3:35:31 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

You sound vaccinated.


93 posted on 11/15/2023 3:37:53 PM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Happersett v minor


94 posted on 11/15/2023 4:11:56 PM PST by South Dakota (Patriotism is the new terrorism .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [88 U.S. 162, 168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens. The words ‘all children’ are certainly as comprehensive, when used in this connection, as ‘all persons,’ and if females are included in the last they must be in the first. That they are included in the last is not denied. In fact the whole argument of the plaintiffs proceeds upon that idea.[iv] (Emphasis added)


95 posted on 11/15/2023 4:25:11 PM PST by South Dakota (Patriotism is the new terrorism .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Happersett v minor
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [88 U.S. 162, 168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens. The words ‘all children’ are certainly as comprehensive, when used in this connection, as ‘all persons,’ and if females are included in the last they must be in the first. That they are included in the last is not denied. In fact the whole argument of the plaintiffs proceeds upon that idea.[iv] (Emphasis added)


96 posted on 11/15/2023 4:25:49 PM PST by South Dakota (Patriotism is the new terrorism .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota
So why hasn't her eligibility to run for president ever been challenged? Or Bobby Jindal for that matter?

Better yet, If you are so convinced she is not eligible to run, why haven't you or a posse' filed a lawsuit attempting to prohibit her to run due to your claim that she does not meet the "Natural Citizen" clause?

97 posted on 11/15/2023 5:14:19 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota
The Original Meaning of "Subject to the Jurisdiction" of the United States

Birthright Citizenship and the Constitution

98 posted on 11/15/2023 5:20:00 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota
Happersett v minor

Meaningless crap, but nice try.

So tell me, why was she and Bobby Jindal allowed to run for office if your own interpretation of H v M was relevant?

99 posted on 11/15/2023 5:22:14 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Because Obama ran and no one said anything.
Closed your mind.
You refuse to see the truth


100 posted on 11/15/2023 6:37:00 PM PST by South Dakota (Patriotism is the new terrorism .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson