Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Flag_This

I vaguely recall reading that the ball-turret was (counter intuitively) the “safest”, or nearly so, position in the B17 or B24. It presented a relatively small target, and the plexiglass is about 2” thick.


13 posted on 11/11/2023 4:50:07 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: NorthMountain
”It presented a relatively small target, and the plexiglass is about 2” thick.”

The gunner I saw mentioned those things and added that the two .50 caliber machine guns were big chunks of steel that also offered some protection from flak. That said, nothing on a B-17 could stop a 20mm cannon shell or a direct hit from an 88, so everyone on board faced the same threats.

14 posted on 11/11/2023 5:30:29 PM PST by Flag_This (They're lying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: NorthMountain
I vaguely recall reading that the ball-turret was (counter intuitively) the “safest”, or nearly so, position in the B17 or B24. It presented a relatively small target, and the plexiglass is about 2” thick.

There was no safe place on an unarmored airplane.

Just an 8mm ball round could go in one side of the plane and out the other. Too bad if you happened to be in the way.

16 posted on 11/11/2023 7:42:12 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson