[...]
- Democrats want power.
- Republicans want money.
This creates the two wings of the Uniparty apparatus.
- Donors to democrats do so in order to support an ideological agenda based around social control; you are a prole.
- Donors to republicans do so in order to support financial control; you are a serf.
This is the main distinction between the two corporations that align with mutually beneficial non-compete clauses.
As long as democrats allow republicans to operate systems toward their objective, the assembly of wealth, there is no opposition to the democrat agenda of social control. This is the baseline of the political frustration noted by almost all “republican” voters. The GOP politicians who are created by the billionaire donors are not acting on a priority to defend, preserve or support individual liberty. The GOP politicians prioritize what their benefactors tell them to prioritize, the assembly of wealth and financial control.
It is accurate that DC republicans and democrats are aligned in foreign policy.
Democrats want interventionist policy to create larger power centers for globalization and dominance in social systems.
However, the core of the republican opposition to Donald Trump is not directly related to foreign policy, their opposition is related to how economic control is diminished under the Trump America-First program, and as an extension this diminishes interventionist foreign policy spending.
Democrats do not like the inability to influence global affairs because they want social controls.
Republicans do not like the inability to influence global affairs as a tool to protect their financial structures.
- Democrats want power.
- Republicans want money.
[...]
Interesting Tucker’s Uniparty description.
It sounds much like the the deal struck in Nazi Germany, where the industrialists, bankers and landowners were left alone to make their money as long as they ceded social control to Hitler’s government.