The site has already been visited countless times, by many many different research teams. I saw a documentary on it probably twenty years ago. Geologists are almost all basically in agreement the formation is rock, that is native to that area, and the formation is not that unusual, other than it is visible on the surface when most are underground. It would be great if it was something more, but according to all samples so far it’s not petrified wood.
“The site has already been visited countless times, by many many different research teams. I saw a documentary on it probably twenty years ago. Geologists are almost all basically in agreement the formation is rock, that is native to that area, and the formation is not that unusual, other than it is visible on the surface when most are underground. It would be great if it was something more, but according to all samples so far it’s not petrified wood.”
I do satellite archaeology as a hobby using Google Earth. Have since Earth was released for public use. I have studied this particular site with great interest ever since I found out about it. It is a natural formation. There are hundreds in those hills and around it. They just do not happen to be shaped like that one. The shape is absolutely coincidental.
When my mother was in hear late 60’s she said something that I thought was profound regarding trying to find Noah’s ark. She said it’s safe to assume that Noah and his offspring probably took the ark apart and used it for lumber for various things they had to build after the flood.