Much like the vile paid anti-vax grifting Q-Anon $hills on this forum
Wow...you managed to wrap up ALL of the leftist media, Alinsky projection (accusing other of being/doing what YOU are) terms, into one sentence.
Why not tell us exactly who these folks are, that you’re referring to?
Wow...you managed to wrap up ALL of the leftist media, Alinsky projection (accusing other of being/doing what YOU are) terms, into one sentence.
Now, Jane, there's at least one poster on FR who regularly tosses out what surely is meant as an insult in the general direction of anyone she disagrees with as a "horrid $hot $shill", based on her own highly emotional opinions, and nothing else. Well, if them's the rules, how could such a person object when the tables are turned, using exactly the same level of evidence?
But "Alinsky projection?" Is that a thing? Or are you vaguely aware of Saul Alinsky's miserable legacy, and creating a new name for what Rush Limbaugh called the "Democrat Playbook"? Rush's moniker was a lot more clear, and particularly witty and biting because it echoed a trope associated with Joseph Goebbels; Rush was basically calling the Democrat machine in general, and the Clintons in particular Nazis. Mixing up Alinksky's "rules for radicals", which did not, in fact, include the "Democrat Playbook" as a concept seems to dilute the impact by mixing metaphors. But effective argument doesn't seem to be a high priority for some on FR these days.
Why not tell us exactly who these folks are, that you’re referring to?
Why would that be of any interest to you?