By the way—if you have to point to positive law, including, for example, the 14th Amendment, to prove your membership in the U.S. polity, you’re a Naturalized (i.e., Foreign Spice) Citizen.NBCs are what’s left over after all Positive Law Citizens are filtered out. In the long history of the United States, hey never had to point to positive law to prove their membership in the U.S. polity.
You should argue that to a court. Oh, never mind.
14A governs the citizenship status of all persons born within the territory of the United States. It has been doing so for a century and a half.
0 for 361 is not a good batting average.
BIRTHER SCORECARD (last updated 2015)
https://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/birther%20case%20list.pdf
Original decisions, total cases: 226
Birther wins: 0
Total appellate court rulings: 120+
Birther wins: 0
Total supreme court rulings: 35
Birther wins: 0
Yeah, courts are a waste of time. Too many incompetent people and liars running them to get anywhere with that route.
They reject hearsay unless it's approved hearsay, and then they mandate it as "law."
The judicial system in America needs a serious overhaul. We need to restore it to competence and functionality.
Article II, section one, clause 5 is NOT about citizenship. The issue of persons to whom the provisions of the 14th amendment applied was decided by SCOTUS in the 1870 Wong Kim Ark vs US case.
The Article II clause is strictly about what class of US citizen is eligible to be POTUS, as that issue has NO OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL APPLICATION.
Discussions about whether or not 14th amendment citizens are citizens at birth AND therefore eligible serve only to pettifog the actual issue at hand.
... forty thousand Frenchmen...🤨😉