President Trump’s Motion to Stay the Un-Constitutional Gag Order in D.C. District Court
“No Court in American history has imposed a gag order on a criminal defendant who is campaigning for public office—least of all, on the leading candidate for President of the United States.” pic.twitter.com/wn9qawT68G— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 20, 2023
“…the prosecution concedes, President Trump has not unlawfully threatened or harassed anyone…[the court] cited no evidence…made no specific findings, and declined to give any meaningful consideration to the prosecution’s lack of proof. These are fatal omissions.” pic.twitter.com/GOGKEGXj4t— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 20, 2023
The “breathtakingly overbroad Gag Order…prohibits any public comment regarding a wide and undefined set of individuals and subjects. In doing so, the Gag Order shields public officials in the highest echelons of government from criticism, including key political rivals.” pic.twitter.com/L7VVOZz2xD— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 20, 2023
The Gag Order violates every fundamental principle of the 1st Amendment
It restricts the top candidate’s rights AND “eviscerates the rights” of hundreds of millions of Americans “who the Court now forbids from listening to President Trump’s thoughts on important issues.” pic.twitter.com/8BDBC8vUOl— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 20, 2023
“…in a dizzying irony, the Gag Order lists a long line of Supreme Court cases protecting the civil rights of criminal defendants in hopes of silencing the criminal defendant in this case. This violation of the First Amendment is egregious and intolerable.” pic.twitter.com/IW2jJUMsDU— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 20, 2023
The corrupt Biden regime is trying to imprison their number one political opponent for exercising his First Amendment rights
And now they won’t let you criticize the corrupt actors who are perpetrating this sham pic.twitter.com/HFiGx40Yom— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 20, 2023
President Trump’s legal team criticizes Jack Smith’s “amorphous, and constitutionally invalid” claim a gag order is needed to protect “public confidence” in the justice system
Is this a violation of the gag order? 🙄🙄🙄 pic.twitter.com/ulaRix6OIG— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 20, 2023
There is ZERO evidence for the court and prosecutors’ claims that witnesses could be “intimidated” — “most of whom had already been criticized by millions of people across the country before President Trump commented on them.” pic.twitter.com/tA8H33RfbZ— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 20, 2023
The idea that Pence, Barr, and Milley would be “intimidated” is absurd
Each “are extremely high-level public figures who have voluntarily entered the public arena and invited the cut and thrust of public debate by openly criticizing President Trump.” pic.twitter.com/whWRZjrvMY— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 20, 2023
“The Gag Order violates a long series of First Amendment doctrines. First, it violates three of the First Amendment’s most fundamental precepts at once: It is a (1) content- based (2) prior restraint on (3) core political speech.” pic.twitter.com/eVCLBuXb7t— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 21, 2023
The gag order is targeting speech in support of the leading presidential candidate’s re-election campaign
It’s truly unfathomable this is happening in the United States of America pic.twitter.com/whZUnplSAI— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 21, 2023
“Here, The Biden Administration seeks to bar President Trump from speaking because it does not want the public to hear what its opponent has to say.” pic.twitter.com/1eCMkO2AR4— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 21, 2023