To: nickcarraway
2 posted on
10/06/2023 3:45:33 PM PDT by
PeterPrinciple
(Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
To: nickcarraway
It’s been my understanding that “an eye for an eye” was an improvement. In other words, equal compensation, so to speak. To prevent harsher judgments.
4 posted on
10/06/2023 3:52:21 PM PDT by
P.O.E.
(Pray for America.)
To: nickcarraway
5. If a judge try a case, reach a decision, and present his judgment in writing; if later error shall appear in his decision, and it be through his own fault, then he shall pay twelve times the fine set by him in the case, and he shall be publicly removed from the judge’s bench, and never again shall he sit there to render judgement.
9 posted on
10/06/2023 4:12:46 PM PDT by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
To: nickcarraway
What we refer to as the Code of Hammurabi was actually a compilation of the king's decisions in specific cases brought before him. In effect, the king's directives were recorded so as to assure consistency in future cases and to give the public notice of how the king's powers would be applied.
A similar system based on decisions in courts led to the development of the common law in England, which was carried over to America in the colonial era and remains viable today.
To: nickcarraway
I agree that false accusers need to suffer the most severe sentence for whatever crime they tried to frame the innocent person/people for.
12 posted on
10/06/2023 5:39:37 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson