i get it. wiki used to have solid references. It was a good place to start. I have editing privileges there and I stopped. My changes with solid references\footnotes got wished into the cornfield.
As I took a 2nd look, I still don’t see how “they” got it so wrong about Gaza etc...along with not so hot references.
i still think it’s a good place to start.
I usually go there first, then hit Britannica. It’s fine for some things, and useless information about the Hollywierd types lol.