Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
barred from making or authorizing public statements, including on social media platforms, that carry a significant likelihood of causing material prejudice to the case. . .

Way-way-way-way-WAIT!

You mean this man has a significant following--that will believe him, rather than the US branch of Pravda that runs our television sets?

Not possible. You've been telling us non-stop that Brilliant Biden wowed the electorate with his mouth and his redolent pants with a booming voter turnout in the middle of the night in 2020, and has been bringing America to new heights of domestic happiness and international near-competence for 1,000 days.

What could it matter what Trump says about an unrelated proceeding?

7 posted on 09/23/2023 3:42:40 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SamuraiScot

Any sort of political speech from DJT would fit the ban because it could affect people’s opinions of DJT and some of those people could be jurors..


9 posted on 09/23/2023 3:50:39 AM PDT by arthurus (i covfefe i )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: SamuraiScot

He’s got Trumps balls in vice grips at the moment

Pretty much anything he says can be construed to be in violation

How long before Trump tests this with a rant and what will happen then?


11 posted on 09/23/2023 3:56:37 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson