A 2 second search brings up a list of his stuff that IS peer reviewed…and found to be inaccurate and presents unsupported claims.
https://healthfeedback.org/authors/peter-mccullough/
And we all can surely trust these internet fact checkers. They would never ever lie to us.
Blennos’ comment is exactly right. McCullough is willing to change his advice to fit the facts, unlike the rigid and fact-free “fact checkers”.
And a link to the paper...
And something else to think about...
If there's nothing to this why is Deep State hiding adverse events data and screwing with medical coding?
https://healthfeedback.org/authors/peter-mccullough/
I went to your link to look at it. Who are the "peers" claiming his stuff is "inaccurate" "incorrect" and "flawed reasoning"? I didn't see any names attached to the pronouncements, and I am way past the point where I accept the opinions pushed by media or bots.
How do we know any of these people categorizing his claims, are knowledgeable experts without an agenda?
But how we know that those peer reviews are accurate?