Juries are told ‘you only have to believe the woman’, I’ve seen it firsthand. It isn’t always about proof, which is insane.
I’ve no idea if he’s guilty or not but this seems like a case where there’s no evidence, other than testimony.
That's what I thought. It's a bad verdict, just like too many of our modern court rulings.
I don't even know the guy's politics, so I assume he's a liberal, but this doesn't sound like justice to me.