Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bk1000

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/who_shot_John

And wouldn’t Nixon have said “Jack” or “Kennedy”? If he was being familiar enough to call Kennedy by his first name, I would think Jack would have been the first choice.

Conspiracy theories are silly fun. But I imagine when the power players actually stage an event, it won’t be obvious to keyboard warriors with an internet hook up, and anyone in the know who blabbed wouldn’t be allowed to resign, they’d have a sudden heart attack or conveniently fall out a high window.

If you can figure out a conspiracy just by “research” online, then it’s probably nonsense. If you’re right, then why would “they” let you continue talking about it?


69 posted on 09/07/2023 11:05:42 AM PDT by CrazyCatChick (DEATH POKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: CrazyCatChick

“If you can figure out a conspiracy just by “research” online, then it’s probably nonsense.”

Sure, but this neglects to take into account that people were doing actual research, going out and tracking down witnesses, analyzing photos, films, the autopsy report, and the Warren Commission testimony, for decades in this case before the internet was invented. And of course there are reams of evidence that is only available because information that was classified for decades is now public, and the declassification of that information didn’t serve to debunk the theories, but in fact confirmed some key points instead.


93 posted on 09/07/2023 12:43:42 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson