One wonders how it is that a drug with decades worth of medical history in humans behind it, including Nobel prizes for its discovery, yet the entire medical establishment in the western world was calling it 'horse paste'. Huh, you might think that perhaps there was an agenda involved, and not actually the 'science' that was claimed.
The deep state and big pharma appreciates your support.
How is that relevant to a proper clinical trial? If you want to propose a different design, great. What is it?