True. Unless he has something in his lab that he is basing his conclusion on.
There is nothing less credible than science in 2023.
True. Unless he has something in his lab that he is basing his conclusion on.
He has handled some physical evidence, pieces of "craft" apparently, but I don't know the results exactly, other than he thinks it is manufactured and not natural. He does have a personal experience from his youth, when while finishing his paper route, he saw an object fly over very near. Maybe not 100% objective, but I don't think he's pursuing the subject to satisfy a bias. He's using his brilliant mind to apply the scientific method to what evidence is at hand, and probably to help solve a very personal puzzle that motivates him.