Replies

Excerpt of EasySt's post:
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 09/01/2023 Vol.472, Q Day 2135, EasySt wrote:
That first real conversation between me and the TFT threads went on
well beyond what Ransomnote posted.

~Easy
Indeed it did. It really did.
When you were linking your posts on the TFT, you failed to post the link to your complaint about the Q threads. You know, your belief about "Concerted efforts to target specific anons that demonstrate capacity to make people think."
You just happened to overlook that post wherein you stir it up on a peaceful, collaborative thread with the same criticism of people on the Q thread you've posted again and again on our thread. You really know how to stir it up on FR; I'll give you that. I can't think of anyone who can disrupt with frequent, voluminous 'victim' status posts as well as you can.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled A Weekly Dose of President Trump - Trump Family Train September 1, 2023/October 31, 2023, EasySt wrote:
“Perhaps some USED TO BE anons but are not allowed on the Q thread anymore.”
~~~~~~~
^Truth^
And that is one of *my* beefs.
Concerted efforts to target specific anons that demonstrate capacity to make people think.
(Some of the players find that kind of anon to be by far the most intolorable.)
Do not doubt that it IS a battle space, with lots of “sides” and agendas packed together.
~Easy