TRUE CONFESSION: I NEVER WANTED TO BE A FORBIDDEN CITY ANON
More about that in a moment. First, a few comments on the recent shame storming attempt which begs the ridiculous question, "Are you ANON enough?"
There are some on our Q threads who work to construct a two tier caste system of Anons, and to convince the rest of us we are beneath them, on the lower tier. They pose as judges gate keepers of the 'real' Anon category. If you push back on their demoralization campaign, they can be quick to chastize you with the reminder that 'No Anon is above another.'
I tried to show them the absurd level of irony in their strategy.
But I don't think they 'got' it (1, 2).
Their own fake classification system for 'real' Anons seems to indicate they aren't 'real' Anons.
Personally I think some of them likely started out as trolls on the Forbidden City, but state-level weapons-grade trolls there ate their lunch and forced them out, after which time, they came here (YMMV). And to borrow the words of the best President ever, "They're not sending us their best....."
This 'status seeking' effort to demoralize the Q thread FReeQs has been going on for years. One of the most memorable times I encountered the fake Anon caste system was a pompous post on our threads telling us we shouldn't be researching for ourselves, but should spend time contemplating what the Anons said about the drops! *pausing to squeal the words, "We're not worthyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!"*
That obviously goes against the Q movement's key principles. I should probably post the rest of Q3038 instead of just the excerpt at the start of each of our threads. Here's rest of the drop excerpted at the top of our threads:
Q3038 excerpted
Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022
>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
I recall one self-imagined member of the supposedly 'elite' Anon caste ranting in an email to put me in my 'place'. He hurled insults that he seemed to perceive as lightening bolts, and as if he was imagining his words were backed by the swell of a mighty orchestra as thunder and black clouds came down, and a roaring wind began to drive hail.
That seemed to be the content of his posturing as he reminded me that I am on the lower tier of his preferred Anon caste system. But at the time, reading his rant just made me think of the noise made by playing cards clipped to the frame of a bike wheel (bike wheel go brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr).
The piece de resistance he saved for the end, was his supposedly momentous pronouncement, "You are not a man.....and you never will be." (bike wheel go brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr).
I never wanted to be a man, and never plan to 'transition' to be a man, and for this I am to hang my head in shame?
In the same way, I never wanted to be one of Q's direct Anons, building drops on the chans.
To be an Anon, I would have to replace all that I know and am able to do, and become someone else entirely with different cognitive gifts, thoughts, interests, level of patience, vocabulary (heh) etc. I admire the extremely rare skills, sacrifice and patriotism of Q's original Q forge Anons, but I'm nothing like them, and I would have to have a head transplant to become one. I would have to give up my God given design and identity, all of my natural emotions and memories, to grasp at something else that others were designed and called by God to do far better anyway.
And besides, who would make sure to plug in the Easy Bake oven back in the sanity lounge.....? I mean, the plug is a little loose at almost 500 breads, so you have to jiggle it to make sure it connects properly.
It helps at times like these to, ahem, consider the source when some ridicule God's design for our lives and/or contradict Q's principles.
That is the other reason for my post - I meant it as a friendly reminder to FReeQs to 'consider the source'. He who denigrates us and the Q thread, on Free Republic and Twitter, as clowns in a traveling tent show, never to be taken seriously again, can't expect me to value his opinions. His 'good' opinion can't be worth anything.
It's awkward at the same time it's quite efficient - I don't value their approval and they tell me I can't have it. Win-Win.
We 've long had self-perceived Anon 'elites' who remain here to discourage, shame, and judge us out of encouraging one another and red-pilling. Our encouragment fortifies our information warfare armor and they want it gone. They attack our legitimacy and if we defend ourselves, they imply we're 'uppity'.
These ridiculous snarks about 'real anons' are just more of that demoralization tactic (see #8) which Oratam shared with us long ago.
I believe they stay here even though they despise us, complaining about FR oppression like it's Communist China, and delivering spontaneous, pointless snarks to stop us from being as effective and contented as we are.
If we weren't so effective, they would have moved on to ankle bite somewhere else.
I still wonder though, how can they quote 'No Anon is above another' while preening as they do? What part of understanding that statement is 'hard'?
What is an Anon?
There are a few different ways this term is legitimately described, but 'real' within a fake caste system is not one of them.
There was one person posting on FR I suspected was an Anon among those working with Q to hammer out Q drops. I have no proof but I had my opinion. He said one day, out of irritation with those 'bragging' about their Anon cred, that "No one who publicly claims to be an Anon (i.e.,working with Q making drops) is an Anon. We have targets on our backs and you won't see us going around annoucing who we are. We want anonymity, not attention!" That seemed reasonable and timely to me. That was one way 'Anon' was initially used to identify a uniquely skilled band of brothers working direclty with Q.
The word Anon was eventually used by many to indicate 'anonymous person supporting the Q movement' and later still, by out-and-proud Q supporters photgraphed hold Q signs at rallies.
Q endorsed this usage; the movement was never intended to be limited to the initial Anons, but instead always intended to grow world-wide like it has. Hence Q dropped many wonderful pictures of Q movement supporters, a.k.a. Anons, across the US and around the world and acknowledged the words of others.
*sigh* I can see this post is going to run too long so I'll break it into two parts. I'll try to push the remaining encouragement content into post #2. (Yes, I'm going to get uppity!)
When I started reading Q drops and realized what was happening, my anguished prayer was, "Father in Heaven! Please give me something to do, any little task! Anything! Please let me help!" I did not pray, "God, please make me an Anon," or worse, "Please make me a 'real' Anon."
There's a Q drop that shows a meme with the text (paraphrasing off my bad memory), "God brought you here for a reason." Isn't that enough to satisfy our desire to contribute? Can't those who whine/snark that we are unworthy take it up with the One who created us and called us to serve?
Part #2 when I have time. It's a promise, not a threat. We have much to be grateful for. God is so good to us!
