Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

Sorry for being dense, but I don’t follow any logic in your follow-up. If you’re not sure, FR message me. It seems you embarrassed both of us. I guess my goal now is to never make it into your boxed-out and targeted post format.


1,456 posted on 08/29/2023 11:58:07 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1387 | View Replies ]


To: SERKIT

Serkit,
I know you did nothing wrong. I never thought you did anything wrong. I use boxes for all posts when possible.

I thought my original post may have implied I ‘knew’ the UN was there and in my reply to you, tried to clarify my original post at the same time I followed on your post. I missed the fact you were referring to my info about the UN’s program with Hawaii and thought you were politely standing back from off remark about the UN being there.

I apologize for embarrassing you. I didn’t realize that my post sounded like scolding - I was cheerful when I posted it. I’m sorry, my FRen, for being so vague. We can message from here if you prefer.


1,457 posted on 08/30/2023 12:03:17 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1456 | View Replies ]

To: All
ransomnote: The following contains my comments, a link to a 15 minute Jonathan Turley podcast (December 2020, audio recording) about Newsweek's article regarding martial law, and best of all, concise hi-lights from the podcast followed by links to skip to specific content in the recording.

My comments: On a website called listennotes.com (where has this website been all my life?) I found highlights of a  podcast  titled Ep. 267 US Military PREPPING for MARTIAL LAW by Jonathan Turley.

In it, Turley is responding to a Newsweek article asserting that the US military was divided and those forces opposed to Martial law were former their organized resistance against an anticipated presidential declaration of martial law. I likely thought, in Dec of 2020, that Newsweek/MSM were just trying to undermine the public's confidence in Trump and his military at the time. But looking back I can see how traitors could have been organizing, or threatening to organize a counter movement to the potential of martial law.

If there's any truth in the Newsweek article, then Black Hat plants in the military (looking at you, Milley, Mattis, Kelley etc.) could panic some of the younger less experienced men by insisting that Trump was a tyrant who wanted martial law to stay in office despite supposedly losing the election. 

Innocent military members could have been gaslighted by those above them in rank- told that the head of the military and congress, Pence etc. all 'knew' Trump was planning a coup and any service members 'caught' supporting 'dangerous' 'lawless' Trump would be exposed and court martial-ed as traitors etc.

Sadly, any innocent military caught in that psyop, believing they were protecting the public from the long predicted by Treasonous MSM and members of congress (e.g., Speaker of the House, Pelosi) likely discovered the truth eventually, and regretted the opportunity lost had they just trusted President Trump. How many of those mil might then be forced to take the 'vaccine' a year or two later in order to remain in the military?

It's possible Trump would not have declared martial law in Dec 2020 anyway, for a number of reasons, including the hold the MSM/traitors in Congress had over half the country - so many Americans needlessly lived in terror of coup/President-for-life back then.


1,459 posted on 08/30/2023 1:23:33 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1456 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson