Please do...if you can be coherent. So far, you’ve exhibited no evidence that you have that ability.
I asked a civil question, and you’ve responded with insults and gibberish and silly gifs.
Reading between the lines though, you imply that you believe that SCOTUS has already decided that an NBC requires something more than birthright citizenship. That’s probably a good idea, but if you think that’s the current law, you’re wrong.
Do you somehow think that making the observation that something exists is endorsement?
That’s the reasoning of a child.
But you won’t say, so we’re left to guess exactly what you do think, and what should be done to correct things.