The Moon Landing: Stanley Kubrick's Greatest Film: How NASA and Hollywood Fooled the World (Video)

The Why Files ^ | 07/20/2023 | Why Files

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

Well ... there’s 7 years spent studying physics at the university and graduate level, 4 years studying electrical engineering at the graduate level.

Ah, so you used someone else's research to gain your knowledge of the Van Allen Belts. Got it.

[NorthMountain]

You used someone else’s research to post that comment to me.

[NorthMountain]

Here's something for you to think about, regarding other people's research:

You do not know how to make a pencil

[rx]

Yes, when thinking 6/1000ths, I typed '6mm' for flimsy foil. Sorry to so confuse the easily confused!

As for the rest, why the tape to close gouges? Why half-inch + gaps at the seams? What NASA construction engineer don't cut mating edges to within a half inch? Why from Apollo 11 to 12 does foil "shielding" disappear? You imply you can't condescend to be called to account for that?

Gee, isn't the total lack of radiation shielding through and beyond the VABs rather important to sustaining life? NASA claims it accidentally destroyed that technology. That's as credible as Joe Biden's claims that he never talked to Hunter about his overseas business.

[NorthMountain]

I can’t read your mind, only what you type. 6mm is not 6 thou.

And I’m not doing any more of your homework for you. You really have to read beyond “aulis dot com”, you’ll find your answers.

[frogjerk]

Like I said I believe most likely we went to the moon, but you have to be open to the idea that aspects could of been faked.

No you don't have to be open to that idea. And most likely doesn't cut it. It happened. 3 Astronauts from the US went to the Moon on Apollo II. Neil Armstrong stepped off the Lunar Lander onto the Moon. There is absolutely no uncertainty to it.

[PCPOET7]

wow you have so much faith that stuff that happen when you were a child or before you were born is exactly what you think it is. everything one has learned in life has to be subject to revision because of the fact that it’s just easy to be wrong on things.

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

You do not know how to make a pencil

Of course I do. I just don't have the tooling or materials to do so.

Here's something you forgot about research.

We're all standing on the shoulders of giants.

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

You used someone else’s research to post that comment to me.

So did you.

The only difference is that I'm not the one acting like I invented it.

[NorthMountain]

You falsely accused me twice, after injecting yourself into a conversation about which you knew next to nothing.

Goodbye.

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

You falsely accused me twice, after injecting yourself into a conversation about which you knew next to nothing.

The fact that you lie about my posts to you tell me everything I need to know about your intellectual dishonesty.

FRegards,

[NorthMountain]

You wrote: "Here's something you forgot ... "

Nope. Didn't forget anything. You posted a falsehood.

You wrote: " ...acting like I invented it".

That implies another falsehood about me.

So I am correct about falsehoods in your posts.

You can spin and deny all you like, but your falsehoods are right there in black and white.

Don't bother replying, unless it's a true apology.

[Donnafrflorida]

And you know this how? No the earth isn’t flat. I don’t believe in UFOs. And no I don’t believe we LANDED on the moon. Stop with the insults. Many of us “deniers” aren’t idiots. We have degrees. We have 3/4 century of research and life experiences.
we are successful. Over the last 10 years my research has shown how our government is so beyond corrupt , evil, lie after lie after lie. Believe what you will based on your own extensive research.

[Donnafrflorida]

You really are a peach. Living with someone like you , not open to other opinions must be a real blast.

[NorthMountain]

God bless you.

[Fledermaus]

What does that got to do with my comment that tech is cheaper today?

[Ignatz]

Radio waves travel at the speed of light (186,411/mps), so there would have been a slight delay both directions. The call was absolutely doable, though.

[cgbg]

NASA got caught faking communications (i.e. no lag time from “the moon”) many times in their Apollo archives.

Over the years they have been playing “whack a mole” trying to fix them once some Internet sleuths discover another one.

[Ignatz]

“NASA got caught faking communications (i.e. no lag time from “the moon”) many times in their Apollo archives.”

Interesting. I’ve never heard/read that before. Can you share your source?

[cgbg]

Here is the “official” explanation for the lack of delays:

https://www.quora.com/Why-did-there-seem-to-be-no-delay-in-communication-between-Mission-Control-and-Apollo-astronauts-on-the-moon

However Internet sleuths who got into the weeds and didn’t trust NASA’s version found many “non-lag” back and forth between “the moon” and NASA.

NASA’s “they were really talking over each other” “explanation” is hilarious.

By Apollo 15-17 the astronauts got lazy and bored and sometimes forget to “wait” the required time while they frolicked on their “moon dune buggy”.

Houston did maintain discipline—they did not seem to “talk over” anyone....

:-)

Btw—proof of the “dune buggy” hoax is at the very bottom of this article:

https://www.aulis.com/rover_fenders.htm

Apollo 15,16 and 17 dune buggies had the exact same oil leak from the left rear wheel—at that point the stage crew was just getting lazy—no need to fix oil leaks when you are not actually driving anywhere.

:-)