Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hardspunned
Under the most rosy scenario the air, intelligence and ready reserves involved alone will be hundreds of billions over the next decade or so.

It's trackless wasteland. The USSR only 'defended' it on the Eastern side to try and prevent escapes. No one is going to devote "hundreds of billions" to do anything there, for any reason. I think you have no idea what you're talking about to the point you can't recognize how ludicrous you sound.

All of it was totally unnecessary until NATO’s meddling Russia started invading neighbors and their remaining neighbors took notice and decided to get off the menu.

FTFY

30 posted on 08/14/2023 10:09:56 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Gunslingr3

Well shoot, if it costs nothing to defend the border and nothing will be done for Finnish defense, why in God’s name did the Finns join NATO? Did they just want to weasel their way onto the Russian nuclear target list? Why should an American neocon care how much it costs? We’re printing $600 million a day for Uke corruption. What’s a few billion more for Finland? If, as you say, Finland needs zero upgrades to be able to fend off the Russians, why did the DC MIC oligarchs get Finland in in the first place. No weapons bought, no kickbacks laundered back to DC. You really don’t know how DC operates.


31 posted on 08/14/2023 10:31:32 AM PDT by hardspunned (Former DC GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson