Posted on 08/10/2023 12:25:14 AM PDT by RandFan
@DougAMacgregor
Many Americans don't trust the electoral process.
We watched the 1960 election stolen.
The difference between the steal in 1960 and what happened recently is that Nixon decided not to contest the election, despite clear evidence that it was stolen.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
"We used to say election day was resurrection day".
I've never heard about this before.
Fascinating....
“We used to say election day was resurrection day”.
The dead rise to vote!
Seems to have been going on a while then..
I’ve not heard about this before. Before my time 🤔
By the 1980’s, liberals were admitting that the 1960 election had been stolen
More recently
In 1960 I was 9 years old. We lived out in the country and seldom had a TV signal much less news stations. We wouldn’t know if the election was stolen.
BTTT
That is amazing she admits it.
The two states that swung the election to JFK were Illinois and Texas, Illinois where the Mayor Daley political machine was accused having dead people voting and Texas where LBJ was accused of the same thing
In Nixon’s case he conceded and moved on and ran for Governor of California and lost then ran for President again in 1968 and obviously won this time
The dead rise to vote!
By the millions, I think, and I also think millions know, that Nixon was WELL aware of it.
Well known 40 years ago. It was discussed often in, say, the National Review.
Nixon was horribly abused.
For instance, Robert Caro’s biography of Lyndon Johnson (Vol IV, The Passage of Power) states how he rigged the 1960 election in Texas. Footnotes and all.
This all is no secret.
Of course you’ll say it never happened, right?
This is commonly known in west Texas and Chicago. To be honest, from national to city-type elections...I doubt if any of them are totally free of corruption.
Another good example is the SF city mayor recall election election of 83 (Mayor Feinstein defeated this with 81-percent of the vote) is commonly believed to be rigged.
The 1973 SF mayor election (Mascone versus Barbagelata) was heavily screwed by the Jim Jones ‘sect’ (coming in from outside of town to vote).
It wouldn’t shock me if 10-percent of Hillary’s votes in 2016 were corrupted. You find any state where there’s only 3 or 4 percentage points of difference....then you go and buy the votes to swing things.
The two states that swung the election to JFK were Illinois and Texas, Illinois where the Mayor Daley political machine was accused having dead people voting and Texas where LBJ was accused of the same thing.
```````````````````````````````````````
No doubt that Illinois was stolen but Texas alone would have been enough stolen. JFK would have won without Illinois’ electoral votes.
No doubt that Illinois was stolen but Texas alone would have been enough stolen. JFK would have won without Illinois’ electoral votes.
p
LBJ and the mayor of Chicago did the deed.
Nixon knew it was stolen but conceded “for the good of the country” and likely he knew the courts would not touch it and the Republicans would not say any more than, “Too bad. We lost. Better luck next time.”
Almost 15 states where difference is 5-percent or less difference between the two guys. Whole last two weeks of campaign is a pretty big ‘if’ situation...for both Nixon and JFK.
This has been well known for more than 60 years. The colonel is not exactly prescient for finally figuring it out now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.