IMHO what the GOP should always do is put it back on the Dims. Make the Dims state why they support "abortion" even after birth. The GOP should articulate the brutal steps of a partial-birth abortion and make the Dims state why they support a procedure that involves having to hold the baby's arms and legs still and puncture his skull to literally suck his brains out. The GOP should ask the Dims if it would be okay to do those kind of things to a puppy dog --- if not then why is it okay to do it to a baby? The GOP should state over and over and over that at one time the Dims said blacks too were less than human beings, just property, and if history shows the Dims were wrong about that then the Dims are wrong about a baby even with arms and legs already developed being "just a clump of cells".
That way the pro-life position isn't won over most people is because it's never described in detail for the gruesome barbaric thing that it really is.
I agree 100%
In fact, since political speech cannot be censored, I believe the gop prolife candidates should run ads depicting an ultrasound of an abortion. let the pro abortion “moderates” defend abortion.
Not a bad idea! As Coach Tom Landry used to say - "A good defense is a good offense".
“ IMHO what the GOP should always do is put it back on the Dims. Make the Dims state why they support “abortion” even after birth.”
The argument back is that in most places that is illegal. And, it is a very, very rare circumstance. A reasonable opponent would make that an easy win for the libs.