[DiogenesLamp]

It’s nice to see at least some discussion that takes the Constitution into account.

I think you are referring to your preferred version of it. John Eastwood is a constitutional scholar and the whole thing was his idea, but people want to believe what they want to believe.

What happened could not have possibly turned out worse than it did.

This was a coup.

[mmichaels1970]

I think you are referring to your preferred version of it.

I have no preferred version. It is what it is. But I do prefer debate that rationally cites it regardless of which side of the debate the person is on. I’m NOT a constitutional scholar. So I appreciate it when it is used as a foundational part of debate. It’s how I learn.

Taking my limited knowledge of it into account. It’s always been my thought that the actual selection of electors was up to the states. And if the state has issues with fraud, it’s up to the state to fix it. I do not insist I’m right, nor will I insult somebody with a different interpretation.