Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: norsky
Well here is a pretty good article about Trumps getting elected difficulties for us.

They Can't Let Him Back In Michael Anton

The people who really run the United States of America have made it clear that they can’t, and won’t, if they can help it, allow Donald Trump to be president again. In fact, they made this clear in 2020, in a series of public statements. Simply for quoting their words in an essay for The American Mind, I was mercilessly mocked and attacked. But they were quite clear. Trump won’t be president at noon, Jan. 20, 2021, even if we have to use the military to drag him out of there.

“Anti-Trump hysteria is in the final analysis not about Trump.” If the regime felt that strongly back then, imagine how they feel now. But you don’t have to imagine. They tell you every day. Liz Cheney, Trump’s personal Javert, has said that the 45th president is literally the greatest threat facing America today—greater than China, than our crashing economy, than our unraveling civil society.

That’s rhetoric, of course, but it isn’t merely that. It’s safer, and generally more accurate, to assume that your adversaries mean what they say. If you doubt this, ask yourself: When was the last time they acted more moderately than they talk?

“Anti-Trump hysteria is in the final analysis not about Trump.”

“Our rulers’ wealth and power rise with open borders, trade giveaways, and endless war.” Anti-Trump hysteria is in the final analysis not about

6,370 posted on 08/21/2023 1:17:39 PM PDT by norsky (<P> <a href= > </a> <P><h3> <P><img src=" "width=500"></img> )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6367 | View Replies ]


To: norsky
“What if, somehow, Trump is acquitted or gets his case tossed out?” Then I think you will see the same indignant reaction, but from the other side. Suddenly it will be Blue America declaring all our institutions, and especially the courts, illegitimate. You might even see some attempts at blue secession, e.g., “Calexit.”

Plan C, if none of this works, is to have Trump declared ineligible under the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment. This is riskier than Plan B. If they couldn’t get a Senate vote in favor (and, absent a conviction, I don’t think they could), it would come down to a mere court opinion. If you think Trump’s base will howl over a conviction in a DC kangaroo court, wait until you see their reaction to some Democratic-appointed appeals judge saying Trump can’t run. Even if the regime got the Supreme Court to uphold that 9-0 (and they won’t), Trump’s base won’t accept it.

Plan D—just beat him at the ballot box—is also risky. The country is in desperate shape. Biden is enormously unpopular. Harris is spectacularly unpopular. Getting rid of one of them will be hard. Getting rid of both? The first black, South-Asian, and female vice president and heir apparent? Does anyone think the race-and-sex-obsessed Democratic base of 2024 is going to tolerate that?

And then who do they replace them with? Gavin Newsom? A ciswhite male? Even if they can get past that non-trivial problem, which they can’t, Newsom has no appeal outside deep-blue America. I’m not saying he would certainly lose, but it’s dicey as hell, especially with a demoralized base and the very strong likelihood that the state he governs will be deep in recession by election time.

Plan E is to cheat. I know what you are thinking. But I’m not talking about Dominion voting machines. I mean the kind of “pre-cheating” that the regime boasts about as “election fortification”: change the rules in advance in ways that favor Democrats and hurt Republicans, especially in swing states. There is no question that they will do this. Why wouldn’t they? It worked last time, and the more overt cheating they can avoid, the better.

https://compactmag.com/article/they-can-t-let-him-back-in

6,371 posted on 08/21/2023 1:23:18 PM PDT by norsky (<P> <a href= > </a> <P><h3> <P><img src=" "width=500"></img> )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6370 | View Replies ]

To: norsky

An excellent article!

I can’t believe it is over a year old.

So much he speculated has come to pass.

I’d like to read what Anton has to say about what they are doing to Trump now.


6,373 posted on 08/21/2023 2:04:44 PM PDT by Lakeside Granny (IN GOD WE TRUST with TRUMP WE STAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6370 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson