Unbelievable. Smith and Gaston urge Chutkan to grant a protective order in a case against the former president of the United States even before his lawyers can respond.
Chutkan then gave Trump's team 2 days (one business day) to respond, denied a 3 day extension.
🍌Republic pic.twitter.com/09DLQCig67— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2023
Gaston threatened to withhold initial discovery production until Trump signs protective order. She ordered Judge Chutkan to deny Trump's request for just 3 extra days to respond to Gaston's late Friday night docket dump.
Chutkan just granted Gaston's request. pic.twitter.com/a3xa7Ce7P5— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2023
Molly Gaston is asst. US Atty who filed proposed protective order (basically a gag order on Trump) that included his Truth Social post.
Gaston is in a big hurry to go after Trump.
But Gaston wasn't in a hurry to go after this guy a few years back...https://t.co/UBTcw5Qm3u— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2023
This statement by Judge Chutkan in her landmark ruling denying Trump exec privilege protections from House Democrats J6 committee alone should be disqualifying.
There is no way she can objectively oversee Jack Smith's J6 case against Trump. pic.twitter.com/VDIbIQnyJ5— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2023
As I've noted over and over. Local rules allow 14 days for counsel to file a response to a motion. Chutkan cut that down to 2 days, including one business day.
Trump's lawyers asked for a 3-day extension. She said no. This is not standard practice by DOJ or Chutkan. https://t.co/70hWSZx31H— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2023
A proper media not in the business of humiliating itself on an hourly basis as the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party and Biden regime would be howling from the rooftops that Jack Smith wants to keep evidence away from the public/media in BOTH cases against Trump.
But no: https://t.co/MoXLeSuuHI— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2023