Skip to comments.
Was the Moon Landing Faked? This man believes it was! (Video)
Valuetainment ^
| Patrick Bet-David, Bart Sibrel
Posted on 07/31/2023 6:20:48 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 201-213 next last
To: Jan_Sobieski
Apollo only took about 15 minutes to get through the Van Allen belts. They aren’t a “wall” at all.
121
posted on
07/31/2023 11:11:00 AM PDT
by
Campion
(Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
To: cgbg
thank you. there have been some great resource recommendations in this thread.
To: Jan_Sobieski
123
posted on
07/31/2023 11:16:07 AM PDT
by
C210N
To: Campion
The radiation “measurements” through the Van Allen belt that were preserved from Apollo 11 are a total joke—blatantly fake.
That is why current astronauts in the Artemis program keep talking about radiation risks—they know.
124
posted on
07/31/2023 11:16:42 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
To: cgbg
Take a look at the command and lunar module computers—there was no way they could possibly work—and NASA knew it. That meant navigation became impossible once the communications delay from Earth kicked in.... (four seconds each way to the Moon) which in turn would mean certain death for the astronauts: That is complete nonsense. It's even factually wrong. Just divide 250000 (distance earth-to-moon in miles) by 186282 (speed of light in a vacuum in miles per second). You get about 1 1/3 seconds. Round-trip it was about 2 1/2 seconds.
"Navigation becomes impossible" with a 2 1/2 second roundtrip comms lag? Why?
125
posted on
07/31/2023 11:16:49 AM PDT
by
Campion
(Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
To: cgbg
Wrong.
However, it is true that Apollo, which had a steel skin, is probably a better radiation shield than Artemis will be.
126
posted on
07/31/2023 11:17:39 AM PDT
by
Campion
(Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
To: C210N
The best conspiracy movie on this topic was “Capricorn One”.
OJ Simpson starred as one of the four astronauts on a faked Mars landing.
127
posted on
07/31/2023 11:17:58 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
To: Jan_Sobieski
Thank you.
While no mention of Op Mockingbird and Kubrick, very important to question the Allen radiation belts.
128
posted on
07/31/2023 11:18:23 AM PDT
by
C210N
To: Campion
A few seconds and a wrong turn and you are dead—”cold equations”.
129
posted on
07/31/2023 11:18:56 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
To: cgbg
OJ Simpson starred as one of the four astronauts on a faked Mars landing.I'll bet he was a real cut up on the set.
130
posted on
07/31/2023 11:20:08 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: central_va
“cut up on the set”
Lol.
Spoiler alert.
He died an ugly death in the movie—right here on planet Earth.
131
posted on
07/31/2023 11:21:13 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
To: GingisK
They didn’t need Photoshop, movie people could do things on film since it’s invention.
Heck, the Soviets could erase and add people to photographs in the 40s and 50s and 60s.
132
posted on
07/31/2023 11:22:29 AM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(It's time to get rid of the Three McStooges; Mitch, Kevin and Ronna!)
To: cgbg
He died an ugly death in the movie—right here on planet Earth.Ugly indeed no matter how you slice it.
133
posted on
07/31/2023 11:22:53 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: cgbg
That's a non-answer. We're talking about celestial bodies moving at known velocities. You schedule course corrections and the like
in the future -- even if "the future" is only 20 minutes away, that blows any 1 1/2 second comms lag out of the water.
And, except on Apollo 13 where they had to do some seat-of-the-pants because systems had failed, you program the relevant commands into the onboard computer, which was very simple but enough to do the job, and it takes care of timing burns and attitude correctly. And that's all you need.
The actual computations were done by top-of-the-line IBM mainframes on the ground; the onboard computers were only responsible for physically executing the burns.
134
posted on
07/31/2023 11:23:38 AM PDT
by
Campion
(Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
To: srmanuel
Those 1100 year scientists were smart. LOL
Typos.
135
posted on
07/31/2023 11:24:18 AM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(It's time to get rid of the Three McStooges; Mitch, Kevin and Ronna!)
To: cgbg
More on Capricorn One—Hal Holbrook was outstanding as the NASA boss managing the coverup and “handling” the astronauts—first by telling them it was their patriotic duty to lie and then when that didn’t work telling them their families would be killed if they did not play ball.
136
posted on
07/31/2023 11:25:06 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
To: Fledermaus
137
posted on
07/31/2023 11:25:08 AM PDT
by
Campion
(Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
To: Campion
Those onboard computers could not “physically execute” anything—they were props for the dupes.
138
posted on
07/31/2023 11:26:04 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
To: cgbg
Imho Capricorn One was what some of us “conspiracy types” call “limited disclosure”—using fiction to subliminally prepare the peons for future revelations.
139
posted on
07/31/2023 11:27:47 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
To: ConservativeDude
We could do it. We just couldn’t do it with THAT technology. Largely because it’s just too old and crappy and we just can’t replicate it anymore. There was a balancing act of bad technologies helping each other work in spite of how cruddy they were. And of course it was all built from machines with the same balance of crappiness going on.
It would be like trying to make a brand new as it was Model T. We just don’t have the stuff to make machines that bad but still working anymore.
140
posted on
07/31/2023 11:28:24 AM PDT
by
discostu
(like a dog being shown a card trick)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 201-213 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson