The article is trying desperately to convince us that there was a woman warrior. That will destroy the Patriarchy, I suppose. And if there was ONE woman warrior, so what? Proves what? The vast majority of warriors were men.
And what if they determine that a man was a gardener? Would that destroy the hunter-gatherer theory?
The good thing about the article is that it shows that sex can be determined long after death, contrary to what the gender-obsessed mob is saying.
You’re right. They try to convince that anyone buried with a sword and was female was a warrior.
It’s a ruse. Warriors have tell tale evidence of heavy use of one arm and many injuries. I don’t recall a single one of these burials that was actually a woman.