Posted on 07/28/2023 4:38:29 PM PDT by GingisK
Sean Kirkpatrick, who leads the Pentagon's UFO office, ripped whistleblower testimony from a Wednesday congressional hearing that claimed to have firsthand knowledge of "nonhuman" technology, calling the proceeding "insulting" in a post on LinkedIn.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Who is bukakke?
Right. Thank you
Satan’s love child of BlackbirdSST to Bikkuri
Uhhh maybe some.
See.
https://youtube.com/@canammissingproject
I have seen that, thanks. Yes, Greer is informative.
Yeah, it is like that. I used to worry that people would “lose it” if confronted by this as an uncomfortable truth. Now I don’t care what might happen to them.
Thank you for those.
Fair enough.
It’s not enough to have people testifying. I need to see the video they are getting to, or other sensor data that they are referring to. That way, they can explain what they saw and be questioned on their observations.
Otherwise, we’re relegated to appeal to authority arguments. There is just no way to challenge their claims.
Not all oldsters are close-minded.
Otherwise, we’re relegated to appeal to authority arguments. There is just no way to challenge their claims.
I completely agree.
I don't think the purpose of this hearing was to convince Americans of the truth or falseness of the claims being made. I think the purpose of it was to turn the heat up on the Pentagon and to present this testimony to Congress as a whole.
I think the bottom line of this entire matter is that we don't know what is going on but something certainly is AND Congress needs to get the Pentagon to disclose (at the very least to Congress, in open or classified hearings or both) what it (the Pentagon) knows.
Unfortunately for Congress and the American people, the Pentagon has refused to be transparent or to even provide any reasons for their lack of transparency.
There is a huge amount of witness testimony and sensor-recorded evidence that supports the premise that there's a "there, there." What Congress and the American people want to know is "what is it and is it a threat to national security?"
I’m sorry you wasted all that time, because even if this stuff is true none of what you had ‘evidence’ of back matters.
I personally think Grush is just BS’ing, and he said ‘he and his wife’ saw things. What’s she doing in this top secret UFO stuff?
It comes off silly and nonsensical to me. But hey, if they say the lizard people are here, after antifa/2929 ok too. All insanity going on.
The Deep State has spoken: Our trusted official has said nothing to see, move along. Please heed the advice.
I didn’t waste any time at all. I learned plenty that indicates that the government has UFO crash debris as well as ET bodies. You fall in a category similar to Apollo Deniers. Plenty of hard evidence to ignore or misinterpret.
I’ve seen the explanation that almost all video and sensor data is not disclosed due to also disclosing US military capabilities.
We supposedly have done of the brightest and most innovative minds. They need to figure out a way to release the data and be able to be questioned on it.
At least for myself after watching the testimony, it’s not compelling without corroborating material.
I think we're seeing what happens when they lose it. They get all emotional and start screaming "squirrel," "shiny object," "distraction," etc.
I wouldn't be surprised if DU got all emotional, but it is shocking that people on FR have.
I thought conservatives were the adults in the room and, as such, would approach this thing logically and rationally.
Instead, many of them just scream and run around in circles.;-)
It seems it has.
You’ve got to admit that Sean Kirkpatrick, for an alien, speaks pretty good English.
—
Actually he’s a hybrid - you can tell by the set of his eyes.
At the very least, the sensor data needs to be reviewed by scientists (with clearances if nec.) who can comment on what has been recorded.
It is still an appeal to authority, but at least such "authority" will have greater independence and scientific/technical capability for analyzing and commenting on the "evidence."
Apollo denier?
Ok, where’s some pics of ET bodies. Where is EVIDENCE beyond fuzzy pics. Comparing someone asking for alien evidence to moon landing denial is stupid.
“Why is there a Pentagon office of AARO?”
Because there is an unexplainable problem with objects on training grounds and military facilities that do not belong.
—
“What is their annual budget?”
Classified.
—
“What is Kirkpatrick’s job description?”
He heads ARRO; the rest is classified.
—
“What does Kirkpatrick actually do for his pay?”
He testifies that the phenomenon his offices investigates does not exist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.