I just identified the source of the petition to the UN as Russian, since the petition is not available anywhere else. I’ve read the UN content on and off over the years and have never seen a ‘peer review’ and in this case, one is impossible because only content supporting NATO/US claims will be considered and the rest subverted in a media blackout.
I also posted as ‘ASSERTION’ some Twitter content and for this I’m supposed to spend all day dealing with your waste-of-time ‘input’ like ‘Twitter?’ This you describe as ‘hysterical screed’.
It looks like you’re saying if I find your content and self-serving distortions is a waste of my time, I’m still expected to spend my time repeatedly refuting you until you get tired? If I don’t wait until you get tired and instead choose to do something of value instead, after I already achieved my objective by posting content for FReepers to consider, then you say it means I’m ‘taking to the hills’? I just don’t ‘babysit’ your kind, okay? I welcome all readers of the thread to spend as much or as little time on it as they wish.
Ah, you’ve lost.
I challenged your position and that gave you the fantods, because your position was — from the very start — untenable.