This public advocacy group does not present its own credentials in past construction, administration and evaluation of clinical trials. What sort of experience do they have. They seem to be drawing lots of conclusions but are not presenting the entirety of the data.
Why not present the numbers in total and let people evaluate them.
Why didn’t Moderna, hmmmm...
>Why not present the numbers in total and let people evaluate them.<
Without this group you would have to wait at least 75 years to “see the numbers”.
Draw your conclusion from that.
EC
They don’t present the info because they would find this autopsy was not needed because the patient who was found under the tires of the Mack truck that he turned in front of at day 182 and died suddenly probably didn’t need an autopsy to figure out the mechanism is death. But, you know, Clot $hot. Horrid vax, shot shill and all the rest. It seems there is a lot of vax threads today. I have found s direct correlation between the increase in vax threads and the emergence of a Q thread. Let’s see if the trend holds.