Posted on 07/23/2023 12:43:10 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
Senior lawmakers are increasingly demanding that military and other government officials provide them with information about intelligence on unidentified flying objects (UFOs) or unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs).
The demands reflect frustrations on the part of some lawmakers that they are being kept in the dark about what’s known about UFOs and UAPs.
The lawmakers do not necessarily believe the government is hiding signs of extraterrestrial life from the public and congressional oversight. But they are frustrated they are not learning more about unknown objects flying in restricted U.S. air space.
“My primary interest in this topic is if there are … object[s] operating over restricted air space, it’s not ours and we don’t know whose it is, that’s a problem that we need to get to the bottom of,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
[...]
“Right now, what I know is reliable people tell us that and we’ve seen objects operating over restricted military and national security airspace. They claim it’s not ours. They claim they don’t know whose it is. That’s like the definition of a national security threat,” he said.
“Either there’s an answer that exists and is not being provided, or there is no answer. Beyond that, I don’t want to speculate anything,” he added.
Rubio said he was familiar with the claims of David Grusch, a career intelligence officer who worked for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. He claims the federal government has retrieved “non-human origin technical vehicles” that have landed or crashed on Earth.
[...]
“One of two things are true. Either A, they’re telling the truth or some version of the truth or B, we have a bunch of people with high clearances and really important jobs in our government are nuts. Both are a problem. And I’m not accusing these people of being nuts. That said, that’s something we’ll look at and continue to look at seriously,” he said.
...disruptive to that web with negative consequences to many races throughout the universe...
I agree also... Absolutely fits with what I have figured out myself.
It is like blowing up a bridge or offramp. The system is based on plasma threads, Nuclear can sever or damage these plasma threads.
Clearly his question was a toughie.
Is that all you've got to say for yourself? Or do you actually have a constructive comment to make on the subject of this thread?
Hey, tired&retired, we are talking about possible spiritual aspects of the UFO gig. I'd love you to weigh in here.
I think we are headed toward a major harvesting of souls. Some will move on to a domain that is more aware, others will remain here.
Ah, you are one of those who can't read all of the news in about an hour. You get stuck.
Or, maybe you are just a government agent trying to get people to look elsewhere.
I’ve always been amused by eyes that glow. Only dimwits think a light source in the light sensor makes sense.
As an aside, I was listening to an interview recently with Sean Cahill (who was Chief Master-at-Arms on the USS Princeton when the tic-tac incident occurred).
He said that after returning back to port and returning home to his wife, he (and his wife) began to experience something in the home that can only be described as a poltergeist. This would not necessarily be related to the tic-tac event except that there have been similar reports from other seamen after that incident.
Thank you, I would be curious where he stands also.
Maybe the others are trying to force disclosure without presenting themselves.
“I’ve always been amused by eyes that glow. Only dimwits think a light source in the light sensor makes sense.”
That depiction is from the cheesy 50s SciFi movies.
The famous Malmstrom AFB UFO incident occurred in 1967 (UFOs interfered with nuclear missiles at that base with 10 nuclear ICBM's going off-line).
And there have been similar reports for the last 70 years.
Are you saying this is all part of a program of distraction? Is so, who is behind it and what would their objective be?
Not saying that you are necessarily incorrect. Just wondering if you are making this comment off the top of your head or if you have actually done any reseach on it.
I guess we find out shortly.
The rest of us aren't so easily distracted.
Myself, I'd like to hair moron this scruffy situation.
“Are you saying this is all part of a program of distraction? Is so, who is behind it and what would their objective be?”
Since they have been documented for 5,000 years, that it is one hell of a distraction effort. lol
I will have two questions for them:
1) Which branch of government do you work for?
2) When did the agency develop telepathy?
Followed by a futile plea for them not to change my gender or turn me into Dimocrat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.