Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tench_Coxe

I believe this is about the electors.

Smith will probably allege criminal fraud. However, that is absurd, Pence’s job was on the line and Pence was fully aware of all relevant matters.

Trump’s lawyers can be expect ted to put Pence on the stand and Pence will be asked questions.

Did your ticket with Trump lose in Michigan?

I believe so, and that was certified by the legally designated officials of Michigan.

Was your ticket with Trump cheated in Michigan?

I’m pretty sure there were election irregularities that were in Joe Biden’s favor.

Were you aware that....


18 posted on 07/21/2023 9:09:14 AM PDT by Brian Griffin (ARTICLE I SECTION 2....The President...may require the opinion, in writing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brian Griffin

Your scenario raises many constitutional issues, including separation of powers. Pence would never take the stand. But we live in a post Constitution Anerica, so I won’t totally eliminate your scenario.

The written record stands on its own - I am unaware that the issue of fraudulent MI electors was raised in Jan 2021 electoral proceedings at which the master of ceremonies Pence was carrying out merely administrative tasks .... before the subsequent demonkkrap congress passed a “law” enshrining the VP’s duties as merely ceremonial.

BTW - I disagree with Turdley if he thinks Trump’s speech contains some evidence, though insufficient, to file charges against Mr Trump. That speech does exactly the opposite.


30 posted on 07/21/2023 10:06:01 AM PDT by Susquehanna Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson