Very perceptive.
Face it it’s one party rule and you can’t question the democrats
p
It's going to out-california California within five years, under the iron fist and stiletto heels of the Michigan Demon Girls.
And there's a good chance that "Nazi" Nessel is a case of demonic possession.
AL GORE vs GEORGE W...
Al Gore Wasn’t ‘A Man’ about Losing
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/al-gore-wasnt-a-man-about-losing/
What Happened to the Democrats Who Never Accepted Bush’s Election
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/12/19/2004-kerry-election-fraud-2020-448604
VP Harris’ new comms director said George W. Bush ‘stole’ election from Gore, was ‘illegitimate’
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/vp-harris-jamal-simmons-george-w-bush-stole-election
No, It’s not fair, but what’s new about the undemocratic party? They give everybody the shaft all the time. The democrat party is the banana republic party.
And this from December 12, 2016:
Podesta backs bid to overturn electoral vote
Another question I'd like an answer to, is why didn't anyone indict Al Gore back in 2000 for trying to overturn the election in Florida?
[statute revised since the election]
3 U.S. Code § 5 - Certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors
(a)In General.—
(1)Certification.—
Not later than the date that is 6 days before the time fixed for the meeting of the electors, the executive of each State shall issue a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors, under and in pursuance of the laws of such State providing for such appointment and ascertainment enacted prior to election day.
(2)Form of certificate.—Each certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors shall—
(A)set forth the names of the electors appointed and the canvass or other determination under the laws of such State of the number of votes given or cast for each person for whose appointment any and all votes have been given or cast;
(B)bear the seal of the State; and
(C)contain at least one security feature, as determined by the State, for purposes of verifying the authenticity of such certificate.
(b)Transmission.—It shall be the duty of the executive of each State—
(1)to transmit to the Archivist of the United States, immediately after the issuance of a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors and by the most expeditious method available, such certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors; and
(2)to transmit to the electors of such State, on or before the day on which the electors are required to meet under section 7, six duplicate-originals of the same certificate.
(c)Treatment of Certificate as Conclusive.—For purposes of section 15:
(1)In general.—
(A)Certificate issued by executive.—
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors issued pursuant to subsection (a)(1) shall be treated as conclusive in Congress with respect to the determination of electors appointed by the State.
(B)Certificates issued pursuant to court orders.—
Any certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors required to be issued or revised by any State or Federal judicial relief granted prior to the date of the meeting of electors shall replace and supersede any other certificates submitted pursuant to this section.
....
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/5
“I, Gretchen E. Whitmer, Governor of the State of Michigan, certify that at the general election held in Michigan on Tuesday, November 3, 2020:
“The following persons nominated by the Democratic Party, each having received 2,804,040 votes, were duly elected as Electors of the President and Vice President of the United States of America:
....
“Votes received by other candidates for the office of Elector of the President and Vice President of the United States of America are as follows:
“The following persons nominated by the Republican Party each received 2,649,852 votes: John Haggard; Kent Vanderwood; Terri Lynn Land; Gerald Wall; Amy Facchinello....”
https://www.archives.gov/files/electoral-college/2020/ascertainment-michigan.pdf
This is called lawfare, folks. It is the democrat’s favorite weapon in the ongoing CWII.
“Not only would each certificate he introduced be “regular in form and authentic,” he said at the time, but they would be the ones that “the parliamentarians have advised me is the only certificate of vote from that state, and purports to be a return from the state, and that has annexed to it a certificate from an authority of that state purporting to appoint or ascertain electors.”
“It was a mouthful with a purpose. Pence was incorporating the specific legal language of the Electoral Count Act — the 1887 law that, along with the 12th Amendment, governs the counting of electoral votes. The law requires that any electoral votes counted by Congress be submitted by official state authorities, like governors and secretaries of state.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/11/pence-jan-6-election-certification-script-00016539
This really upsets me. Ken Thompson is a good man.
They were successful in Georgia doing this. More states are coming.
They are trying to prove that all seven swing states did this under direction from Trump. And offering immunity for turncoats.
See my posting history for the link which explains this...newsweek.
Extremely frightening to live in this country these days.
The Electoral Act was changed in 2022.
Quotes from Wikipedia:
On December 22, 2022, the United States Senate passed the Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022, sponsored by Senator Susan Collins of Maine and Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia. After about a year of negotiations, it became as Division P of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, which passed 68–29 in the Senate and 225–201 in the House the following day. It was signed into law by President Joe Biden on December 29.
Some of the highlights of the bill:
Identifies each state’s governor as responsible for submitting certificates of ascertainment, unless otherwise specified by state laws or constitutions.
Provides for expedited review, including a three-judge panel with a direct appeal to the Supreme Court, of certain claims related to a state’s certificate identifying its electors.
Requires Congress to defer to slates of electors submitted by a state’s executive pursuant to the judgments of state or federal courts.
Clarifies that the vice president cannot solely determine, accept, reject, or otherwise adjudicate disputes over electors.
Raises objection threshold from one member of each chamber to 20% of each chamber.
Prohibits state legislatures from declaring a “failed election.” They can now move their election only under “extraordinary and catastrophic” circumstances.
Notably, the relevant clause in 3 U.S.C. § 6 differs substantively from the original clause in Section 3 of the 1887 law, as shown below:
Old version: “if there shall have been any final determination in a State of a controversy or contest as provided for in section two of this act, it shall be the duty of the governor [to transmit a certificate of such determination etc.]”
New version: “if there shall have been any final determination in a State in the manner provided for by law of a controversy or contest concerning the appointment of all or any of the electors of such State, it shall be the duty of the governor [etc.]”
Under the original version, the clause appears to apply only in situations where the final determination satisfies the Section 2 “safe harbor.”
The current version requires a certificate to be sent regardless of whether the safe harbor applies. The difference may be relevant since Section 4 (now 3 U.S.C. § 15) prohibits Congress from rejecting any electors “whose appointment has been lawfully certified to according to [3 U.S.C. § 6].”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_Count_Act
ALL DEMOCRATS ARE EVIL!