I don’t understand why the liberal view is that we are supposed to disparage this film.
Doesn’t everyone, even liberals oppose sex trafficking? Doesn’t everyone, even liberals believe it’s reprehensible?
So if everyone believes sex trafficking is bad, and this movie tells the true story of a man who was fighting back against sex trafficking, what exactly is the objection to this movie?
Rented that it’s a tough subject to discuss , but it tells the true story of someone who is fighting against a criminal element.
I’m sure I’m missing something. Is part of the objection that Jim Caviezel played the part of Christ in The Passion of the Christ ,and he actually is a Christian himself?
Which would then translate into a viewpoint that this individual cannot produce or be involved with anything that is worthwhile?
It is becoming more and more obvious that the Democrat Party has descended into depravity.
You would think, but aparently not.
“Doesn’t everyone, even liberals oppose sex trafficking?”
LOL!
“I’m sure I’m missing something.”
It’s so clear that it’s hidden in plain sight, i.e., those who are objecting ARE pedophiles and consumers of child sex trafficking. There is no other explanation.