I don’t think she could have done anything and agree the politicians did it, sadly starting with Thatcher.
My point is if she’s “Queen” she is by definition responsible for everything.
She appoints the PM.
It’s convention now the monarch does not exercise their power but all power does belong to the monarch even today.
> It’s convention now the monarch does not exercise their power but all power does belong to the monarch even today. <
Yes, true that. I suppose it’s a one-shot kind of thing. By that I mean the UK monarch could strongly and publicly object to something. But failure might well mean the end of the monarchy.
Is it worth the risk? When it comes to the illegal immigration into the UK (and all the associated crimes), hell yes it’s worth the risk! But Elizabeth was hesitant to act. And I’m sure Charles will be, too.
So the question is this. Which descendant of Elizabeth will be the first one to be executed when Sariah Law finally takes hold in the UK?