The forum is under troll attack, too, especially re Ukraine. I don't know if y'all saw Jim Rob's thread spelling it out for thread 'rioters' (my word, not his).
I wondered what motivated that thread post - aside from the usual. It so happens that Jim Rob posted on the thread immediately prior to his. He gave some time out and some were zotted. It was actually a pleasure to see the feisty side in action, but I know it really annoyed him because he said so himself:
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Zelensky Cancels All Elections Becomes Dictator for Life, Timber Rattler wrote: Nah, I'm having a good ol' time here just annoying you.
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Zelensky Cancels All Elections Becomes Dictator for Life, Jim Robinson wrote: Annoyed the hell out of me
That exchange resulted in the ride of the Viking Kitties followed by celebratory posts regarding the zotting of a long-term troll. Nice lightning gifs if you want to pick some up free. That Ukrainian thread is pockmarked with many missing posts (in one instance, 9 posts in a row are gone). Folklore says that 3 were zotted that day...but I didn't check.
Connecting the dots, Jim Rob's post defining, yet again, intolerable behavior likely resulted, at least in part, from increased trolling on that Ukrainian thread. A FReeper mentioned a day or two ago that there's an influx of Ukrainian thread trolling - new names and more aggressive, offensive posts. He asked Jim if maybe we were 'being played'. One post used an ethinic slur Russians use against Ukrainians; I think that was infiltration to portray those not supporting the war as bigotted Russian infiltrators.
At the same time, I do think the Q thread is over the target and taking more flak than we've taken for a long time.
I think the movie was expected to fail and Ballard himself has been targeted for cancellation. When I went digging after the issue of the pattern on his tie (Masonic) was mentioned, I believe I found smear websites that have been under development for a few years - how long has the Deep State known about Ballard's work? Trump's support? I have to say the website looked convincing at first glance, and they bragged about having thousands and thousands of reports, evidence, testimonies etc. Where I used to work, this claim was called the 'thud factor'. If you wanted to convince others to believe you and take you seriously, you announce you have done the research prior to the high stakes meeting and then drop from arms' length a massive stack of encyclopedic sized files/folders/binders so they make a substantial 'thud' when they land. This thud is created to impress and convince before a single word of the presentation is said. It tends to work.
So one of the websites had it's anti-Ballard thud factor down and there may be more. But as I read through the content I could see a factual mistake too stupid for them to explain away or get away with. I was going to list it here but they would just remove it when FR trolls sent them the news.
Personally, I though other anti-Ballard content on that 'thud' website looked silly - like part of their 'proof' was that not one victim put their name/face out there to support Ballard. Uh, Hello? Is there a brain cell in there somewhere? What would the deep state do to a torture victim who put their name/face out there? Why should someone who survived horrific abuse then risk assassination or future capture/torture/human sacrifice? Let the adults handle this and leave the defenseless survivors out of this.
I don't understand the one-post rule against Ballard. He wasn't running for office. We know child trafficking exists and is worse than even that shown in the movie so in that sense, Ballard is just a side issue.
I'm not listing the website or sharing the assertion I believe invalidates that entire thud factor site. I don't want to spread their fake news and invite days of on thread debate between trolls and FReeQs.
There's more on that website- it reads 'plausible' at first and then it begins to show it's true colors as you continue reading. It stealthily ties Trump into it's accusations against Ballard. But it doesn't matter what I say- we each need to dig for ourselves. Also, we know Trump has the resources to vette Ballard too - we're not alone in this. The DS will likely attempt its 'thud' strategy, so it helps if we're ready to respond with the voice of reason having investigated ourselves. Most importantly, it's about the children. Everything else is window dressing - we keep the children and their real suffering as our first priority - not Ballard's reputation. At present I have no reason to doubt him and so I am grateful to God that Ballard has surfaced the issue.
So as the film about child trafficking succeeds, those who investigated Q early on and went away unconvinced are likely going to remember having read about this stuff from Q - elites/pedophilia. They are likely to go find Q threads to see if there's MOAR. Those who only vaguely heard about Q and pedophilia assertions will likely seek to investigate Q for the first time. So Q thread trolls are here to take the Q thread down so seekers can't find info, or cause such disruption on the Q thread that visitors can't find information and can't stand the contentious atmosphere and leave.
I think this means that we need to put more content in the thread 'preamble' in post #1. Tang-soo's boot camp was fantastic so all the content at the links in it were taken down to make sure people couldn't find good information. I think we need a list of resources, trusted people, and perhaps posts that do a good job of helping quickly orient people to be placed within the thread preamble so it's among the first posts they read. Geddes is still great and will help, but I think we need to figure out what Rush's people from Rio Linda would be wanting to find out or read (links to reliable sources, posts, videos etc.) if they come to the Q thread seeking information. If you have suggestions, please email them to me.
This seems like another 'door of all doors'. People used to theorize that at some point Q would be invited to stand along side 45 on stage. I can see that Trump needs to validate Q for those who don't follow comms, but having the team stand next to him might likely guarantee that they and their families would be targeted the rest of their lives.
People also theorized when Q fell silent, that Q would never return. I don't believe that because it would leave all that we learned in the drops to the mists of time to be dismissed as 'conspiracy' mythology never proven.
But having the child trafficking and the Government's involvement surface in public life begins the process of validating Q. People even vaguely aware have likely been startled awake and some are saying, "Wut?! You mean that stuff was real?! Wut else did Q say!?"
The pedophilia among the elites is so hard to believe, and the pedivores at times seemingly impossible to accept, the process had to start somewhere and matter to everyone. On the map, there's a big 'YOU ARE HERE" icon.
Once the public grapples to accept their supposed 'betters' paid for with their tax dollars are child predators, the rest of Q content becomes more accessible - she wasn't suppose to lose, and what was supposed to happen to us if she won.
