[RoosterRedux]

Same here. Read a massive amount and watch a ton of video testimonies over the years. Frankly had a difficult time separating the wheat from the chaff (stuck mostly with accounts that could be corroborated by someone present at the time of the OBE--usually a doctor or nurse).

The thing that bugs me about these accounts is the lack of empirical/rational care on the part of the person experiencing the NDE and the paranormal aspects of the experience itself.

I realize the people experiencing the NDE's are just everyday people, but their lack of deductive reasoning makes their testimony suspect even if it might be true.

[Reily]

Taking them as they are I find the remote viewing accounts the most intriguing. However, it’s all still anecdotal. How do you do any empirical testing? Ask for volunteers to do a Near-Death-Experience and come back under some sort of instrumentation? Not likely!