I thought revenge porn had to do with those who were in a previous relationship. Did she have a relationship with Hunter?
So she is the one who would get in trouble, not the original poster of the tweet...
It is an absolutely ridiculous misapplication of the law. But the important thing to the Dems is they make the charges public, make her defend against them, scream loud and long about the Republican, get their media allies to carry their water, and, hopefully, get her convicted and removed from the Senate or censured. That is all the public will know and remember.
The language of [Arizona] ARS 13-1425 states: “It is unlawful for a person to intentionally disclose an image of another person who is identifiable from the image itself or from information displayed in connection with the image if all of the following apply:
- The person in the image is depicted in a state of nudity or is engaged in specific sexual activities.
- The depicted person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
- The image is disclosed with the intent to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten or coerce the depicted person.”
I don't see how they could argue that ALL of those three criteria apply, especially the second and third items.