So how is he still alive?
What does Hunter know about this?
In the absence of official scrutiny of Biden’s endless spending spree on Ukraine, The Grayzone conducted an independent audit of US funding for the country.
They discovered a series of wasteful, highly unusual expenditures the Biden administration has yet to explain.
ALL ABOARD the Zelensky/Biden gravy train:
an independent audit of US tax dollar funding for Ukraine
BY HEATHER KAISER, ANYA PARAMPIL AND MAX BLUMENTHAL
thegrayzone.com
JUNE 27, 2023
During a recent discussion with New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Samantha Power, touted her organization’s push to guarantee transparency for US taxpayer funds sent to Ukraine.
“We are involved in funding efforts at ensuring judicial integrity, which is intrinsically important to building Ukraine’s democracy and its integration plans to get into Europe,” Power declared, adding USAID’s work in Ukraine was “also really important in terms of assuring the taxpayer, the American taxpayer, that they’re resources are well spent.”
While innocuous on the surface, Power’s comments revealed a great deception the US government is currently waging against the American public. In the roughly 16 months since Russia’s February 2022 escalation of the Ukraine conflict, the US government has approved several multi-billion dollar spending packages to sustain the Kiev military’s fight against Moscow.
Though many Americans likely believe that US dollars allocated for Ukraine are spent directly on supplies for the war effort, the lead author of this report, Heather Kaiser, conducted a thorough review of Washington’s budget for the 2022 and 2023 fiscal year and discovered that is far from the case.
US taxpayers may be shocked to learn that as their families grappled with fears of Social Security’s looming insolvency, the Social Security Administration in Washington sent $4.48 million to the Kiev government in 2022 and 2023 alone. In another example of bizarre spending, USAID paid off $4.5 billion worth of Ukraine’s sovereign debt through payments made to the World Bank — all while Congress went to loggerheads over America’s ballooning national debt. (Western financial interests including BlackRock Inc. are among the largest holders of Ukrainian government bonds.)
Though it is nearly impossible to calculate the total sum of US tax dollars sent to Kiev, Kaiser was able to perform an independent audit of Washington’s proxy war in Ukraine through a careful search of open source data available on the US government’s official spending tracker.
Kaiser reviewed all the funding allocations in which Ukraine was listed as the “Place of Performance” for fiscal years 2022 and 2023. Additionally, she discovered supplementary funds were sent to Kiev by listing Ukraine as the “justification” for spending, rather than the location where the money was physically sent.
Calculating the total dollar amount that the US has given to Ukraine is incredibly challenging for multitude of reasons: there is a lag in reporting expenditures; covert money given by the CIA (Title 50 Covert Action) won’t be publicly disclosed; and direct military assistance in the form of military equipment is not calculated in the same manner as raw cash. The Pentagon recently admitted to an accounting error revised up to 6.2 billion dollars. Despite this, Kaiser submitted a request to the Department of Treasury asking them to disclose the total dollar amount of US taxpayer support for Ukraine. Treasury has not responded at the time of publication.
Though Kaiser was able to search through pages of reported spending, the US government has yet to conduct an official audit of its funding for Ukraine. What’s more, there is currently no limit to how much Washington can send to Kiev.
In the absence of dedicated official scrutiny of Washington’s spending in Ukraine, The Grayzone has produced an independent audit of US tax dollar allocation in the country.
Among the many troubling contracts we discovered was a $4.25 million payment from the Pentagon to a military diving contractor that a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee has described as a “fraudulent company.” The US government asserts the payment covered the company’s delivery of explosives equipment to Ukraine.
So how exactly was that money put to use? And why has Congress so far refused to implement any program to track these shady weapons deals?
Unfortunately, the “justification” for contracts like these often consists of just a brief paragraph — or worse, a single sentence. Little little information is available that documents precisely how the funds were spent down to the dollar and item.
Beneficiaries of USAID’s Ukraine aid: Polish NATO lobbyists, a private equity firm, rural Kenyans, a TV station in Toronto
snip.....rest on grayzone.com
James Dean said “Live fast, die young, and leave a beautiful corpse.” Given the picture in the photo, the best Hunter could have accomplished was two out of three. Honestly…. WHAT’S WITH ALL THE PICTURES?????? A lot of people do a lot of things they shouldn’t, but really who takes and preserves these vast number of decidedly unflattering pictures?
“So how is he still alive?”
No kidding. Why would a guardian angel look after this decrepit SOB? Maybe the undiscerning angel thought “I’d better watch out for the smartest man the president knows.”
He should have died instead of his sister when his mother drove through the stop sign and plowed into the side of that truck.
Seems like a “great reset” going back to Nov. 2020 would be the best way to get this country back on the right track. Having read all the news concerning Biden’s presidency since he was elected really reminds me of what a horrible mistake this has been. The WEF’s “Great Reset” plan that has been touted for some time now was an idea that was set about, only in the wrong way. Now there is no way of knowing what would have happened if the election of 2020 had been different, but one can use their imagination & it probably would show that things would likely be completely different than what we have actually experienced since that day.