Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: norsky

It seems unethical to allow a sitting president to decide if a presidential candidate (his opponent) gets Secret Service protection or not.


7,819 posted on 07/28/2023 2:19:25 PM PDT by CottonBall (“Fascism should be called corporatism because it is a merger of state & corporate power" – Mussolini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7809 | View Replies ]


To: CottonBall

Agree! Heck, not allowing secret service is akin to taking out your opponent....literally!


7,820 posted on 07/28/2023 2:20:55 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7819 | View Replies ]

To: CottonBall

They should have some level of qualifying like (not necessarily identical to) the debates.


7,821 posted on 07/28/2023 2:21:25 PM PDT by nascarnation (Let's go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7819 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson